• JACShelp_outline
    878 posts
    2 years ago

    [deleted]

  • DeletedRemoved user
    2 years ago

    Do you have one for us?

  • JACShelp_outline
    878 posts
    2 years ago

    [deleted]

  • DeletedRemoved user
    2 years ago

    thank you

    I was not arguing.

  • JACShelp_outline
    878 posts
    2 years ago

    [deleted]

  • TimoKpanorama_fish_eye
    300 posts
    2 years ago

    I think haze is a property of the real world. It's there in the scene we want to capture to a landscape picture.
    In painting art they call it aerial perspective, or atmospheric perspective. It's the painting technique to show the distance to different parts of the painting.
    But it's a physical phenomenon, it's really there. We see it, our cameras see it.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    You are correct, but that's aside from my point. I'm talking about its effect on the image, comparing the scene with the haze to the same scene if there were no haze.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2366 posts
    2 years ago
  • JohnSheehyRevpanorama_fish_eye
    549 posts
    2 years ago

    Sensor DR and scene DR are "apples and oranges", though. Even if your scene+optics only has 10 stops of DR, it is still beneficial to have 14 stops of sensor DR rather than 12 stops, if you plan to do much with the shadows. Sensor DR is not limited by actual recording range; it is limited by practical noise. With sensors, more DR means less noise in the deep shadows; it really isn't about "recordable range", per se.