• IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago
  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago
  • finnanhelp_outline
    322 posts
    2 years ago

    HAND.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    I don't know who are nerds, but pros often use a differing meaning.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    For a start, I would be glad to have any constructive and practical explanation from the author.

  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago

    I suppose the other approach is to weed out unnecessary adjectives. In common use we have 'correct', 'proper', 'optimum', 'best', 'good', 'maximum'. If they're all synonyms that looks like at least five too many.

  • Flashlightpanorama_fish_eye
    137 posts
    2 years ago

    I'm off to see a Bourne movie ;-)

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Also, the term "latitude" is very common among photographers.
    I have a few shutters that don't have very fine speed gradations, and even combined with the aperture control (to the point of relaxing DoF requirements slightly) I'm 1/4 EV down from the hottest possible exposure. This isn't a proper exposure?

  • bobn2panorama_fish_eye
    2 years ago

    You should know from 1950's and 60's films that 'hot' and 'proper' don't go together.

  • finnanhelp_outline
    322 posts
    2 years ago

    HAND.

  • DeletedRemoved user
    2 years ago

    A proper exposure is whatever Chuck Norris says it is ... 😃

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2355 posts
    2 years ago

    "scene replication"

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2355 posts
    2 years ago

    No Its Ken Rockwell, and he is a good photographer,

  • Mackiesbackpanorama_fish_eye
    243 posts
    2 years ago

    Why does this thread exist?

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Good question.

  • CAcreekspanorama_fish_eye
    123 posts
    2 years ago

    Thread "why don't cameras have raw histograms" got too long. I stopped reading it.

    I would like to see evidence that an in-camera Raw histogram would help. Can I install RawDigger or FastRawViewer to get an idea? I can't really imagine the situations where I'd want to use a Raw histogram.

    ETTR is no good for me because it makes JPEG too dark. With modern denoise algorithms, noise in underexposed areas is no longer a problem. Or if it is, shadows can be darkened. That is the problem ETTR used to solve. It seems to me that almost any reasonable exposure can be made to work with a good Raw processor such as DxO PhotoLab.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2355 posts
    2 years ago

    Its free for a month. i bought Fast raw viewer, you can then compare and enter these debates have ing the industry standard program.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Depends. It can make OOC JPEGs too bright too.