• IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    image_2023-05-24_12-14-17.png


    Got this from B&H.

    image_2023-05-24_12-14-17.png

    PNG, 646.4 KB, uploaded by IliahBorg 2 years ago.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    live histogram on your Hasselblad is obviously a jpeg. my live histogram/zebras didnt move when i changed WB or even DRO from one extreme to the other.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    i shoot some events in Jpeg. because i can 😎

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    agree. my original thread. "Does Raw Histogram Matter" my answer was NO. good fun though testing with all my gear. but my A74 raws clip the same as my camera histogram, so i dont have that head room irrelevant whether its a raw histogram or not.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Everybody can. Not everybody does, they have their reasons not to.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    Not my experience with the following Sony cameras: a7, a7II, a7III, a7R, a7RII, a7RIII, a7RIV,a7S,a7SII, a9, a9II.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    Not according to the raw files and back-of-camera shots you posted.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    Sorry, but my answer is NO, you are not testing. Tests have protocols, and they are systematic.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    they lack confidence knowing they make mistakes.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    you keep quoting the same cameras. do us all a big favour and post a live histogram from any of those cameras.

  • IliahBorgpanorama_fish_eye
    976 posts
    2 years ago

    ROTFLMAO

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    argumentative. holds no substance.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    😁

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    Question for you JIm what's the latency of the live jpeg image in the EVF and what's the latency of the histogram ?

  • BobTpanorama_fish_eye
    14 posts
    2 years ago

    There is a need. I've been shooting in mute mode with reduced contrast so as to get some semblance of a raw histogram/blinkies. Unfortunately, it means an additional workflow step to process at the chosen profile.

    Yes, it really irks when manuals for flagship professional cameras are written as if it's to be used by a P&S shooter, even worse when they appear to be written by a Japanese computer and put through a translator app.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    I pointed out the differences when you posted the images. You were silent on the differences I identified.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    I don't know what you mean by the word latency in this context. Do you mean the delay between the light leaving the subject and the light entering the photographer's eye? If so, the JPEG image has far lower latency, even if the camera is tethered. But for studio work, I often shoot a test image and look at the raw file, using the information thus revealed to know how much windage to apply to the in-camera histogram in that circumstance. Then you get the best of both worlds.

  • DonaldBpanorama_fish_eye
    2378 posts
    2 years ago

    The jpeg image is shown near instant in my evf or lcd from memory 1/120 sec . the live histogram/zebras takes 1.5 secs to show a reading.