Alan, thanks for the update and reality with time to consider our position.
What I like about this place.
I much prefer threaded view for conducting conversations. But. We can't have it here or anywhere else that I know of. Threaded view is essential for conversations between many participants. When we had considerably more participants, the time required was exhausting and the conversation exchanges not satisfying. I'm finding the size of our present membership plus the weekly formats is manageable.
A real plus of the present platform is the definition/size/quality of the images we can post For a site where the image is our stated priority, that's great and I wouldn't want to see this downgraded. Similarly for speed of operation. I'm not well informed on the following but I think the costs are related to the bandwidth required by the site??? As far as I can see, it is working well for present requirements. Do we have more bandwidth and storage than we need for our present operations? When DPREv was originally established I imagine that a much larger pool of users was envisaged?
Again, here I'm in water over my head. As I understand it, all sites need periodic maintenance. Alan, do you have the skills or can you access whatever might be required ? ie., do we need to be allowing for this in working out a budget and subscription model? What I'm getting at is the longer term sustainability of the site. I don't see point in a short term band aid and we all are very conscious of how much this relies on Alan's energy and commitment.
So. I enjoy the place as it is and find the numbers workable for my needs. I'd like to see it continue and I'm prepared to contribute. But I think we need a clearer picture of the anticipated expenses. I also think Alan needs to be realistic about his own time and energy. A lot falls on his shoulders and if it is all too much, so be it.