• RoelHendrickxpanorama_fish_eye
    940 posts
    2 years ago

    Welcome to the Wednesday Comments and Critique (No Theme & No Brand) thread!

    We are dedicated to continuing the great tradition of this C&C thread because we are convinced that looking at, and talking about images is vital for better photography.

    Our tried and tested concept (15 years and running!) is a weekly "peer-to-peer" photo comments & critique encounter, in which you GIVE and RECEIVE.

    The idea is simple: you post an image and get critique on it, and in return give other people your opinion of their images, or vice versa.

    Any Theme, Any Camera, Any Style, Any Subject.

    We are still figuring out how to create the convenience of threaded view on this new forum.
    For now, let us agree that you post an image with a title and short explanation, and that all comments include the image as a quote.
    Replies to comments may or may not include quotes.

    THREAD GUIDELINES – THE SHORT & SWEET VERSION
    • This thread does not care about brands. It’s not about the tool, but the image.
    • Post one image that you would like to get comments on (exceptions: see below).
    • Change the title of your post to reflect the image’s title.
    • Look at the other images and give your comments on at least one of those.
    • For comments, try to go beyond a simple pat on the back or a short dismissal.
    • Do you like an image (or essay) ? Try to explain WHY it appeals to you.
    • Negative feedback is OK (we all want to learn), but be polite and constructive. Try to explain why the image (or essay) does not appeal to you and how it might be improved.

    We will start with single images. Re-establishing our C&C for essays will be a next step.
    Please limit any individual contribution to a single image. This avoids confusion.

    The critique you give is vital.
    What was your first impression? What catches your eye about an image?
    Why? What do you like, and what distracts you? What would you change?

    Fiddle with the image in your head - composition, perspective, color balance, exposure.
    It is understood that unless the original poster specifically states that they do not want an altered image posted that you are free to alter the posted image and repost it in a reply for C&C purposes (no use for other purposes!). That reposted image may remain permanently or you may remove it after a short period of time if you prefer. No copyright disputes here!

    More general feedback is also welcome.
    Do you know something about taking the same sort of image that would make matters easier - share your own as an example in your reply. Encourage - it is a scary business putting your work up for other people to judge!

    And finally, here are some useful hints for navigating and familiarizing yourself with the forum mechanics of DPRevived:
    • Unfortunately, there is no threaded view (yet). We can’t simply keep images and their related comments together like we used to. So please make clear about which image you are commenting.
    • To do that, you may make good use of the “quote” feature. This allows you to keep the image in your reply. Excess content can be deleted. The “preview” button allows you to look at what you are going to post.
    • There is a difference between the “reply” button that sits at the top of the forum, and the reply buttons under every post.

    • A few threads in this new forum with useful navigation information:
    dprevived.com/t/how-to-use-this-site/387/
    and
    dprevived.com/t/how-to-embed-photos-into-your-post-directly-from-flickr/456/
    (this applies also, with modifications, to other photo hosting websites)
    and
    dprevived.com/t/how-to-quote/1014/

    Have fun and let’s stick together!

  • RoelHendrickxpanorama_fish_eye
    940 posts
    2 years ago

    BROTHERS

    A couple of years ago and with a few years inbetween, I made three documentary series about life in small travelling family circuses. I just approached these people and asked them if I could be a fly on their wall (or rather: on their tent canvas) for a few days.

    The most extensive series was the last one: roelh.zenfolio.com/p1039041345

    Here's an image from that series.
    The two sons of the circus director are having a break between their numerous short acts.
    They are woven throughout the show, filling up the time between other acts that require some setting up of props.

    roelh.zenfolio.com/img/s/v-10/p1722984381-6.jpg

  • ChrisOlypanorama_fish_eye
    1577 posts
    2 years ago

    TOOLS OF TRADE

    Visiting Aberfoyle Antique Market recently I came across this assembly of various implements from the past...

    20230521_124552x.jpg

    20230521_124552x.jpg

    JPG, 3.9 MB, uploaded by ChrisOly 2 years ago.

  • ChrisOlypanorama_fish_eye
    1577 posts
    2 years ago

    Oh I like that. Those 2 individuals dressed very appropriately and bathed in great light, amazing shadows and bright background. It all adds up to a very engaging photo. And taken with E-5 to boot! Excellent!

  • stevet1panorama_fish_eye
    784 posts
    2 years ago

    Roel,

    What a wonderful shot!

    Congratulations.

    Steve Thomas

  • MikeFewsterpanorama_fish_eye
    1937 posts
    2 years ago

    Sweet Dreams.
    sweet dreams.jpg

    sweet dreams.jpg

    JPG, 1.5 MB, uploaded by MikeFewster 2 years ago.

  • ChrisOlypanorama_fish_eye
    1577 posts
    2 years ago

    Ha, good one for a quick street shot. One can imagine what this individual is contemplating - snack, drink, girl, better future. Dreams are limitless...

  • LindaSpanorama_fish_eye
    523 posts
    2 years ago

    Job Security

    IMG 1776 crop 2.jpg

    IMG 1776 crop 2.jpg

    JPG, 5.5 MB, uploaded by LindaS 2 years ago.

  • minnievpanorama_fish_eye
    1933 posts
    2 years ago

    The Garlic Patch
    When I'm at the country house, I post photos of much of nothing, with minimal editing, always an interesting challenge .

    _5281049.jpeg

    _5281049.jpeg

    JPG, 1.6 MB, uploaded by minniev 2 years ago.

  • WhyNotpanorama_fish_eye
    676 posts
    2 years ago

    City Lights

    Variation 2.1 Post Version.jpg

    WhyNot

    Variation 2.1 Post Version.jpg

    JPG, 1.3 MB, uploaded by WhyNot 2 years ago.

  • simplejoyhelp_outline
    1662 posts
    2 years ago

    Looks good - not something I would go for in terms of processing with a shot like that, but indeed - whynot? Looks unusual and interesting - I like it.

    It also helps that I like the composition. I would get rid of the two cables at the top though!

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    The picture:

    _2X25866.jpg

    The picture behind the picture:

    2023-05-26 08.06.21-Edit.jpg

    2023-05-26 08.06.21-Edit.jpg

    JPG, 356.7 KB, uploaded by JimKasson 2 years ago.

    _2X25866.jpg

    JPG, 223.8 KB, uploaded by JimKasson 2 years ago.

  • WhyNotpanorama_fish_eye
    676 posts
    2 years ago

    Forgot the QUOTE!!!! This is in response to MIKE's Post -- SWEET DREAMS

    I like the idea ... and the picture ... That everything is leaning makes me want to lean back with them!!!!

    WhyNot

  • OpenCubehelp_outline
    861 posts
    2 years ago

    dscf0502_$25_72dpi_web.jpg

    dscf0502_$25_72dpi_web.jpg

    JPG, 4.4 MB, uploaded by OpenCube 2 years ago.

  • WhyNotpanorama_fish_eye
    676 posts
    2 years ago

    Since this is an interpretation of the landscape I am looking for a meaning or idea … and haven't decided on one yet .. I think that since you took liberties with those lenticular clouds (generally we only see the top of the wave) that you would have abstracted the foreground more to give an idealize landscape ... I'd go somewhere like this .... but I may presume to much ..... sorry about that ....

    Interpretation.jpg

    WhyNot

    Interpretation.jpg

    JPG, 474.4 KB, uploaded by WhyNot 2 years ago.

  • WhyNotpanorama_fish_eye
    676 posts
    2 years ago

    Thank you for the critique ..... Actually I left those lines in deliberately as part of the story ....

    WhyNot

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    Not sure what you mean by that. It was an IR capture.

  • JimKassonpanorama_fish_eye
    1738 posts
    2 years ago

    I think the subtlety is now AWOL.